
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
I’m so glad to be back!
[cheers and applause]
Hope you didn’t miss me too much. What’s that? Didn’t even notice I’ve been away for nearly three weeks?? Well I’ll have you know that many a devout reader of my blog has been extremely disappointed to see that I have not posted anything in almost three weeks….. right?
[sound of crickets]
Okay so maybe not, but nonetheless, here goes nothing. The past couple of weeks have been filled with many time wasting activities namely work, the gym, thinking, re-evaluations, and more thinking. And one of the many thoughts that ran through my mind was the saying we’ve probably all heard millions of times over– it’s better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all. That is the question. And I guess
above all the questions I’ve been asking myself as of late, is it really, is definitely one of them. And while I could have taken the time to research who penned that expression and what the circumstances were surrounding this assertion, I’d rather not. I’d much rather come to my own conclusions. And I’m going to say that whether or not one agrees or disagrees with this claim has largely to do with what the state of affairs is where his/her love life (or lack thereof) is concerned. Other factors that will effect ones response to this statement include: past and current experiences with love and ones interpretations and reflections of them as well. And assuming said expression only takes into account romantic love, sentiments may vary in regards to the validity of this expression depending upon a person’s perspective.
It’s better to have loved and lost
The person who says this is probably at peace with their past state of affairs where relationships are concerned, and they have favorable reflections. They have been intimately acquainted with what it means to have loved someone deeply, truly and wholeheartedly and they wouldn’t trade those set of experiences despite the pain of losing said boo for whatever reason. Perhaps this is the reflection of the mature mind. They have experienced love and loss and weighed the pros and cons of it all and have determined that the ends definitely justify the means and that even if that love ended in loss, it was worth while. This statement renders love a vital heartbeat in life and that life without it, is well devoid of… life. This is the person who understands that love and pain are often two sides of the same coin, inseparable entities, that can not be had one with out the other. But at what price is this lesson learned?
To never have loved at all…
The person who says t
his has probably either had some really rough encounters with “love” or takes one too many strolls down memory lane. This person would probably compare love to fire and will more than likely chalk love up to be a fire that they would much rather not get burned by. The beneficial warmth of that fire is not worth risking the horrendous burns one may encounter as a result of getting too close. Indeed this statement would almost unmistakeably be made out of deep pain, fear, bitterness and above all not releasing ones self from the memories of yesterday. But could you fault someone for doing this? I most certainly can’t blame them. In fact if we are all honest we can probably recall a time or two in our lives if we had been surveyed, we’d say without a doubt, it’s better to never have loved at all. The difference is, some people make temporary pit stops in that state, while others become permanent residents. I heard that much of life is not what happens but what you tell yourself happened
When love doesn’t end the way we’d hoped it would or expected it to, does the fault lie in the love or in our expectations? Does the notion of loving just for loves sake regardless of how it ends or doesn’t end exsist anymore? Did it ever? And are we even capable of that type of love?
To love or not to have loved, that is the question.